Skip to main content

Guide / Field notes

How to Triage a Music Catalogue Without Automating Accusations

Design a queue, not a mass verdict.

· 12 min read

Input preparation

Define the business question, deduplicate files, preserve stable identifiers and use the best available masters. Record format and duration so later reviewers understand quality limitations.

Batch and triage

Run files through one documented version and sort results into routine review, elevated review, inconclusive and no-follow-up queues. Do not convert provider percentages into invented legal thresholds.

Apply base-rate discipline

When true incidence is low, even a useful classifier can produce more false flags than real finds. Sample every queue, watch clusters by genre and encoding, and estimate review burden before expanding.

Escalate and document

Ask for provenance on selected cases, give submitters a correction path and use neutral language such as 'requires review.' Preserve model version, date and final human disposition.

The short version

Large-scale screening succeeds when it limits claims, samples its own errors and preserves a fair escalation record.

Run a free detection

Frequently asked questions

  • No. It can support a review, but origin and authorship require provenance and context. Do not use one automated or acoustic observation as proof.

Keep reading